🔗 Share this article

Families whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to shoreline retreat say that indecision over how to tackle the issue is causing them avoidable anguish about the eternal homes of their departed family.

An Impending Threat to Historic Graveyards

The council have identified three church graveyards in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being consumed by the ocean in the coming decades.

A recent report on the situation sets out a range of possible actions, from taking no action to exhuming remains and relocating them in more secure locations. Officials maintain it is for local people to determine how to move forward.

“At the moment we’re in a state of uncertainty. It upsets me. They wanted this to serve as their last home, but it isn’t going to be because of the encroaching sea.”

Projections suggest at least part of one churchyard could be claimed by the sea in the next 80 years, but some residents worry it will happen much sooner. “I think it’s got under 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” one said.

Haunted by the Past

A local business owner recalled a school trip to the neighbouring village of Eccles, which has almost entirely vanished into the sea, along with its church and graveyard.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Certain people hold this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to the ocean. They won’t. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go grave robbing in search of valuables. That is completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that befell at Eccles will happen here and there’ll be bones on the beach. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Paratrooper's Grave in Jeopardy

Further up the shoreline lies the burial plot of a former paratrooper who died while serving overseas. His mother said she lost sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It truly disturb me to consider this won’t be his lasting resting place,” she said. “For us it’s an significant place to go.”

She believes, new interments should cease but says it is too soon to disturb existing graves. “My preference for now is to take no action and closely monitor, but an timely resolution must be made when a critical moment has been reached.”

Searching for Answers and Certainty

An absence of consensus over when and how to tackle the challenge has left grieving relatives feeling exasperated and anxious.

Several families want more sea defences to slow the unavoidable loss and to permit burials to continue for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“The situation is very emotive,” a family member stated. “The council’s report was really good, but now there’s confusion about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A coastal manager confirmed the graveyards were owned and managed of the local diocese. “In the end it is up to them to choose the direction to take. We are here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

He added there was time to weigh all the options. “This concerns decades before it begins getting lost.”

“There is no common view on what should happen yet. It requires good community discussions to discover the right solutions for each village.”

The possibility of losing the historic sites was described as one of “immense sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a belief in resurrection, offering a theological viewpoint on the physical disappearance of hallowed earth.